Suggestions for optimized features or net new features related to Design

Examples of features relevant to this page: Team Discovery, Team Actions, Team Types, etc.
*Close this tab to return to the software*

Ability to change ownership of a team

We have people leaving the company or changing roles and we need the ability to have an account admin or account owner be able to change the ownership of a team
Suggested by: Jamie Whited (11 Nov, '22) Upvoted: 24 May Comments: 4
Under Consideration 1.0 2.0 Design Net New

Option for Clients to Enable/Disable Access to Team Discovery for Users

As it is now, it is too complicated for large companies with many users to administer
Suggested by: Pernille Flensted-Jensen (12 Jan) Upvoted: 12 May Comments: 0
Under Consideration 1.0 2.0 Design Global Features Optimization

Give Account Owner and Account Admin access to all Teams

We tell these two user types that they have access to everything but they really don't. I'm hearing a lot of frustration - especially for something that is limited ...
Suggested by: Carissa Gudenkauf (18 Jan) Upvoted: 01 May Comments: 0
Under Consideration 1.0 2.0 Design Global Features Optimization

Ability for admin/owner to delete a team if the team creator is no longer with the company

Some clients who have used PI for years have hundreds of teams used for Group Analytics and TWS. Many of the owners of these teams are no longer with the company. ...
Suggested by: Beth (13 Jan) Upvoted: 17 May Comments: 4
Under Consideration 1.0 2.0 Design Global Features

Ability for the User Role to Share a Team

HR BP's often work together on teams and need to be able to share teams with each other, even when they are users (as opposed to admins/owners)
Suggested by: Pernille Flensted-Jensen (12 Jan) Upvoted: 02 Mar Comments: 0

Add to Team option under Admin drop-down

When on a search results page or in a folder, need the ability to checkmark people and use the Admin drop down to Add to Team (used to be able to do this when it was ...
Suggested by: Kristy Sheikh (17 Jan) Upvoted: 17 Mar Comments: 1
Under Consideration 1.0 Design Optimization

PDF of each individual's DOT

In the team report it would be nice to have another download snapshot for each individual in the team. Helpful during HPS Workshop and team awareness.
Suggested by: Jennifer (17 Jan) Upvoted: 24 Mar Comments: 2
Under Consideration 1.0 2.0 Design

Ability to delete a team that's been run through Team Discovery

Currently you are unable to delete a team that has been run through Team Discovery and must instead modify the members and details of the existing team if you'd like ...
Suggested by: Z. Gunjevic (12 Jan) Upvoted: 17 May Comments: 2
In Progress 1.0 2.0 Design Optimization

Ability to sort teams by creator

Having to scroll through teams created by others is a hassle when there are many...ability to either sort by creator's name or simply "my teams" option would be great!
Suggested by: Kristy Sheikh (18 Jan) Upvoted: 08 Mar Comments: 0
Under Consideration 1.0 2.0 Design Optimization

Faster changes/bulk adding members to a team from the folder tree or auto add from OI link settings

The old TWS format for adding and removing individuals from the folder tree was easier and more efficient -- or add associated team(s) to the OI link settings to ...
Suggested by: Alexis Finley (08 Mar) Upvoted: 17 May Comments: 1
Under Consideration 1.0 2.0 Design

Partner to Partner Sharing of Teams

Ability for PARTNER users to share a team with other PARTNER users
Suggested by: Kristy (09 Jan) Upvoted: 17 Jan Comments: 1
Under Consideration 1.0 2.0 Design Global Features Net New

Allow Greater Flexibility in No. of Teams to Be Bought

Sometimes 20 is too few and 50 too many, so it would be great to be able to offer e.g. 25, 30, and 40 as well.
Suggested by: Pernille Flensted-Jensen (15 Feb) Upvoted: 22 Mar Comments: 0
Under Consideration 1.0 2.0 Design

Have a clear message when all Teams are used up

Client has 5 Teams used up. When attempting to create a new Team, they got this message "This will use 1 of your company's 0 available teams. Would you like to ...
Suggested by: Erik Herman (08 Mar) Upvoted: 17 Apr Comments: 0
Under Consideration 1.0 2.0 Design

Allow Objectives to be re written into the clients own words

For accurate strategy type, the objectives should map to the teams OKR'S, Rocks, Objectives, etc. It would be great if there were an option to confirm the actual ...
Suggested by: Damon Clark (02 Mar) Upvoted: 24 Apr Comments: 0
Under Consideration 1.0 2.0 Design

Differenciate Teams from Design Teams in the list

Wehn opening Design all created teams are visible in a list. However, there is no way to differenciate a "normal" team from a one activated in Design. Users are often ...
Suggested by: Jessica (16 Feb) Upvoted: 08 Mar Comments: 1
Under Consideration 1.0 2.0 Design

A Team Page for each team in Design

Similar to how a Person Page is a static repository of data about a person that can be revisited, there should be a Team Page that maintains information about a team ...
Suggested by: Curtis Creekmore (15 Jan) Upvoted: 24 Jan Comments: 1
Under Consideration 1.0 2.0 Design Net New

Ability to click 'Next' and reveal the Strategy type once the strategic objectives are chosen.

Instead of crossing out of strategic objectives, it would be much cooler if the user has the ability to click 'Next' somewhere at the bottom and reveal the Strategy ...
Suggested by: ashish kumar (03 Apr) Upvoted: 05 Apr Comments: 0
Under Consideration 1.0 2.0 Design

Add a relationship guide, but for teams

In the same way that we have a relationship guide in Inspire to improve the working relationship of two individuals, we should have the same type of content to ...
Suggested by: Stefano (30 Mar) Upvoted: 05 Apr Comments: 0
Under Consideration 1.0 2.0 Design

Revise Team Editing Abilities

put a cap on how many reiterations of edits a client can make to a team - we have noticed clients taking advantage of unlimited editing to run new teams and reduce ...
Suggested by: Page Swanger (06 Mar) Upvoted: 06 Mar Comments: 0
Under Consideration 2.0 Design

Allow switching between self, self concept and synthesis in Design.

Currently, Design plots Self. However, looking at how teams are stretching and being observed provides valuable insight and reflects a more accurate picture of the ...
Suggested by: Damon Clark (22 Feb) Upvoted: 24 Apr Comments: 0
Under Consideration 1.0 2.0 Design

Team Discovery

If you have a bigger team the initials are on top of each other. We use this picture in a powerpoint so no way of seeing the ones under the other. Also when there ...
Suggested by: Lisa Flaten (16 Feb) Upvoted: 17 Feb Comments: 0
Under Consideration 1.0 2.0 Design Optimization

Admin rights for partners

Partners should be able to edit teams that are shared with them.
Suggested by: Brian Gelt (03 Feb) Upvoted: 05 Apr Comments: 0
Under Consideration 2.0 Design

Make building teams easier

From the analytics drop-down, have a team save feature. If you are adding names to the analytics area it would begreat to make it a saved team here
Suggested by: Laura Caton (29 Jan) Upvoted: 06 Mar Comments: 0
Under Consideration 1.0 2.0 Design

Add quadrant titles (Exploring, Producing, Stabilizing, and Cultivating) to competing values matrix

Adding this quadrant references to the graphic in the design software would help learners map over from the leadership styles graphic where reference profiles are ...
Suggested by: Sara Best (16 Jan) Upvoted: 16 Jan Comments: 0
Under Consideration 1.0 2.0 Design Net New

French typo

colloborateur must be collaborateur
Suggested by: José Montoya (10 May) Upvoted: 10 May Comments: 1
Done

Ability to delete designs

When creators of the designs leave the org, we are unable to delete and at least an owner or someone on the back end should be able to do that for us. It really ...
Suggested by: sarah (12 May) Upvoted: 12 May Comments: 0
Under Consideration 1.0 2.0 Design

Make 3rd Party Access Easy & More Visible

PI partners are critical in leveraging the power of PI and TO - the access isn't clear
Suggested by: Ted Olson (05 Apr) Upvoted: 05 Apr Comments: 0
Under Consideration 1.0 2.0 Integration

Re-vamp the teams function to allow users to create teams of more than 20 without crashing.

Our work requires us to create teams with more than 20 individuals consistently. When we do so, the software crashes if we add the individuals in groups of more than ...
Suggested by: Shawn (09 Mar) Upvoted: 09 Mar Comments: 0
Under Consideration

Better reporting for Team Discovery in DOMO - Team Owners AND Users with Edit Access

We have a few clients with 50+ Teams in the Design module and they are constantly sharing and re-sharing edit access with users out in the field. It would be helpful ...
Suggested by: Clayton Ramsey (08 Mar) Upvoted: 08 Mar Comments: 0
Under Consideration DOMO